Strain identification, characterisation and GRAS safety
A GRAS determination stands or falls on whether the organism is what you say it is, and whether its genome carries anything that should worry a reviewer. Both are sequencing questions.
01What this is
Establishing what the organism is, and what it carries
Probiotic, starter culture and fermentation-derived ingredients face a consistent set of questions from reviewers and expert panels. What species and strain is this, established by what method? Does the genome carry transferable antimicrobial resistance? Are there virulence determinants or toxin gene clusters? Is the strain distinguishable from close relatives with known safety concerns?
Those are genome questions, and answering them properly means sequencing and annotation, not a biochemical panel and a species name from a culture collection.
Identification
Whole-genome sequencing with taxonomic assignment to species and, where the genome supports it, strain level. Average nucleotide identity against type strains, 16S and multilocus comparison where useful, and an explicit statement of the confidence the data actually supports.
Characterisation and safety screening
Genome assembly and annotation, followed by systematic screening against curated databases for antimicrobial resistance determinants — including whether they sit on mobile elements — virulence factors, and toxigenic potential. Plasmid content and mobile genetic elements are assessed, since transferability is usually the reviewer’s real concern.
02Deliverables
The safety assessment package
- Taxonomic identification report with the method, the evidence, and the confidence stated plainly.
- Annotated genome and assembly quality metrics.
- Antimicrobial resistance screen covering identified determinants, their genomic context, and an assessment of transferability.
- Virulence and toxigenicity screen against curated reference databases.
- A written safety narrative drawing the evidence together in the form an expert panel or regulatory reviewer expects to read.
03Scope
Where this fits, and where it does not
We produce the scientific evidence package that supports a GRAS determination. In the United States a formal GRAS conclusion normally requires an independent expert panel, and the panel convenes separately from the science. Being clear about that division at the outset saves time later.
The relevant background is a B.Sc. in Microbiology, work on desiccation resistance in Enterobacter sakazakii isolates from environmental, product and clinical sources at the National Center for Food Safety and Technology, and fifteen years of genomics since. A graduate certificate in Regulatory Science from the University of Arizona — taught with Chicago-Kent College of Law and the Critical Path Institute — covers the regulatory framing.
—Also
Related capabilities
Get started
Need the genome evidence behind a GRAS submission?
Tell us the organism, the intended use, and where you are in the process. We can tell you quickly what sequencing and screening the dossier will need.